Wednesday, 14 February 2024

Much More Than A Colorful Collection Of Malay Recipes

 

Much More Than A Colorful Collection Of Malay Recipes

M. Bakri Musa

 

Khir Johari:  The Food Of Singapore Malays:  Gastronomic Travels Through The Archipelago

Marshall Cavendish, Singapore, December 1, 2021. Illustrated, hardcover.

ISBN 9789814841924; 624pp; US $80.00

Foreword by Anton Mosimann

 

What made CNN’s series “Anthony Bourdain:  Parts Unknown” popular and its late host endearing was that he went beyond describing the various exotic tantalizing recipes of the world to telling the unique enchanting stories of the people behind them.

 

         Likewise, Khir Johari’s The Food Of Singapore Malays: Gastronomic Travels Through The Archipelago goes far beyond being simply a rich and colorful compendium of Malay recipes. No surprise that it is now in its third printing after its first in December 2021 and had won many prizes, locally as well as internationally. I was fortunate to get one of the last copies. On a recent California book tour, Khir was pleased to see his book displayed in local Target stores.

 

         At 624 pages with generous high-resolution images on top-quality paper, and weighing nearly eight pounds, this is more an illustrated encyclopedia of Malay culture focusing on the culinary arts. The volume has four sections (“People, Space and Place,” “Indigenous Ingenuity,” “Food As Civilization,” and “Food and the Politics of Identity”), each comprising three to six chapters. Within each chapter are short inserts, with distinct fonts and color page margins, dealing with specific mini topics and loaded with well-researched materials. For example, Chapter I “Setting Sail,” has three –“Malaya Irredenta, Malays, Malayans and Malaysians,” “Melayu” with a quote from Usman Awang’s immortal poem of the same title, and ending with the first recipe, “Asam Pedas.”

 

         As per the foreword, “Khir’s book provides us a deeper understanding of Malays themselves. . . . [O]f how an ingenious people have been able to tap into the advantages of their location between mountain and sea, and their maritime connections, to create a cuisine that is typical of who they are as a people – warm and engaging, willing to experiment and eager to please.”

 

         As for the greater Malay world Nusantara, or Maritime Southeast Asia, this is how Khir Johari describes it in his first chapter:

 

         “Like clouds drifting in a serene sky, a vast constellation of isles and peninsulas – the Malay Archipelago – unravels in majesty from the Indian Ocean to the South China Sea. The island of Sumatra reclines in esteemed repose. The Malay Peninsula meanders like a vine. Arching gently like a string of pearls lie Java and the Lesser Sunda Islands.”

 

         No surprise to the elegant prose. The writer has a graduate degree from Stanford and had taught for some years at a Silicon Valley public school before returning to Singapore.

 

         Khir’s culinary interest began early, having been brought up in a traditional multigenerational Malay family in Kampung Gelam, Singapore, and seeing his mother, grandmother, and assorted aunties concocting tantalizing aromatic dishes in their communal kitchen. Kampung Gelam, in Khir’s words, “was once the capital of Malay intellectual, political and religious life in Singapore.”

 

         Later as an advisor to his California school’s culinary club, his interest was reignited when one of his students whose family had come from India had an Eureka moment: “I have found myself in front of a tandoori oven!” As an aside, it reflects the richness of the curricular offerings of California’s public schools that they have culinary clubs!

 

         While there are many books on Malay history and society, “that on Malay food was under-researched and under-recognized . . . . In order to preserve what we have, we need to document. Sometimes in order to document, we need to first reconstruct.”

 

         And document and reconstruct Khir did, with meticulous research into areas hitherto unexplored, leading him to conclude, “Our island [Singapore] is not only a recipient of the creations from all the reaches of the Archipelago . . .[but also] a creative kitchen hub, spewing forth its own interpretations of what it means to be delicious, and through that, what it means to be a Malay.”

 

         If I were to liken this volume to a publication in my specialty, it would be a super surgical atlas where the author has gone beyond the myriad technical minutiae of detailed drawings and real life illustrations of organs in living colors to adding the history and biology as well as historical vignettes and towering personalities associated, thus bringing out the human dimension to those miraculous operations.

 

         Seeing pictures of those ladies in their baju kurong stirring their kualis brought back my own precious memories of my mother and grandmother back in my Minang Sri Menanti kampung. Thank God Malay women then were not Bedouin wannabees. Hijabs and burkas are serious fire hazards in the kitchen!

 

         This book blazes new, vibrant, and exciting fields. As such, like all good research, it prompts more questions. Khir Johari pines in us for the taste of related cuisines, as with the Philippines’ Mindanao, Southern Thailand, and coastal Indochina’s Chaim community, as well as of Hindu Bali, Protestant Batak, and Catholic Ibans. Beyond are the Malay diasporas on Christmas Islands and Sri Lanka; further west, Madagascar and South Africa; and in the New World, Surinam and the West Indies. Then there is the converse; the influence of Malay cuisines on local Peranakan Chinese and Indian dishes.

 

         The biologist in me is also curious on whether the spread of cuisines across Nusantara would also have its own equivalent cultural so-called Wallace Line, the invisible barrier between Bali and Borneo to the west with Lombok and Celebes to the east that accounts for the distinctly different flora and fauna on either side.

 

         The vibrant vignettes of history, perceptive sociological observations, and captivating human dramas interspersed in this rich volume makes it an invaluable addition to any library, quite apart from increasing the repertoire of creative and adventurous chefs. For Malay kitchens and others interested in Malay cuisines, this is an essential addition.

Monday, 12 February 2024

Cast From the Herd Excerpt #116 Alberta, Here I Come!

 Cast From The Herd:  Memories of Matriarchal Malaysia

M. Bakri Musa

Excerpt #116:  Alberta, Here I Come!


I arrived at Edmonton’s Nisku International Airport on a cool autumn evening, the sun still glowing bright orange in the low western horizon, the residuum of the midnight sun. The outside solitary flag post cast a long shadow onto the pavement. As I emerged from the arrival lounge, a familiar-looking young man extended his hand. 


            “You must be Bakri!” he said with a ready smile. The mention of my name in a strange city and in a foreign country, properly pronounced too, warmed my heart. “I am Ben Azman; we are your welcoming committee,” as he introduced another Malaysian. 


            They took my bags and off we went to his car. “I oso from Malaysia, lah!” the other student finally blurted as he introduced himself. Unlike Ben, he was more Malaysian, meaning, he was rather taciturn. Also unlike Ben whose diction was clear and slow, this other fellow’s words just rushed by in a torrent, made worse by his singsong Malaysian accent, as with emphasizing the last syllable in Malay-see ah as well as oso and ending with the all-encompassing lah. As I was still fresh from my native land I could comprehend him. However, after having listened only to Canadians for the past few days, I found his words just swishing by. 


            “It’s hard to call ourselves Malaysians,” Ben said as we drove off. “We’re so used to being Malayans.” 


            I told him that I was still Malayan as per my passport; I left on the eve of the formation of Malaysia. 


            “This is Alberta,” as Ben waved his right hand across the clear windscreen of his Ford sedan, “wild rose country.” 


            The scene looked familiar, thanks to the many colorful brochures sent to me earlier by the university. I looked around; vast open sky and endless flatland. The soft evening sun gave a subdued beauty to the landscape. It was right out of a Zane Grey novel except for the smooth car ride on the undulating well-paved freeway. That prompted me to ask, “Are there many wild buffalo here?” 


            “Nope, not on these plains! The wild buffalo here are all fenced in. We’ll take you to Elk Island National Park this weekend,” Ben suggested. 


            You could never fence in the wild buffalo back home, I thought to myself. The seladang there is feared; its mere mention would make villagers tremble with fear. Here in Canada, wild buffalo are fenced in and turned into tourist attractions!


            The supreme irony! Here I was in praise of the solitary seladang, cast from its herd and free to roam far and wide. I modeled myself after it. I had flown across the vast Pacific, the towering Rockies, and the rolling prairies only to discover that my idolized wild buffalo but of the Canadian variety had been fenced in. 


            Oh Allah! Bless and guide me in my new life’s journey. Let me be like the seladang of my native land, respected if not feared, and free to roam God’s vast earth, guided only by my deep abiding faith and rich resilient tradition but tethered to neither. Oh Allah! Spare me the fate of my grandfather’s buffalo, well fed and lovingly cared for but alas even the village idiot could lead and control it by holding on to the rope attached to the ring through its nose.


Next:  Excerpt #117:  An Unexpected Identity Crisis

Thursday, 8 February 2024

Prof Nor Akmal bin Wahab

 OBITUARY - PROF NOR AKMAL WAHAB, 1955-2023


Nor Akmal Wahab

Biodata

  • Name: Nor Akmal bin Wahab
  • Occupation: University lecturer, professor of Medical Biochemistry/Chemical Pathology
  • Field of Specialisation: Chemical Pathology, Clinical Biochemistry
  • Born: 12 March 1955 Gombak, Selangor
  • Deceased: 19 November 2023 (aged 68)
  • Cause of death: He was diabetic and passed away of diabetic complications in the ICU.
  • Burial: Perkuburan Meru, Shah Alam, Selangor

High school

  1. Sultan Ismail College (Maktab Sultan Ismail), Telipot, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia 1971-1973, MCE 1973
Tertiary education
  1. Bournemouth College of Technology, University of London, 1974-1976 GCE A-Levels
  2. University of Bradford, UK, B. Tech. (Honours) Medical Science (Chem Path) 1976-1980
  3. Chelsea College, University of London, UK, MSc (Biochemistry) 1981-1982

Academic qualifications

  • MCE (Malaysian Certificate of Education) 1973
  • GCE A-Levels 1976
  • B. Tech (Honours) Medical Science (Chemical Pathology) 1980 
  • MSc (Biochemistry) 1982

Workplaces

  1. USM (Universiti Sains Malaysia) in Penang 1982-1990, USM Kubang Kerian in Kelantan 1990-2011 (total 29 years)
  2. KUIN (Kolej Universiti Insaniah/Insaniah University College) in Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia.
  3. Allianze University College of Medical Sciences (AUCMS) Medical School in Bertam, Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia
  4. MAHSA University in Bandar Saujana Putra, Selangor, Malaysia

Experience

  1. University lecturer
  2. Clinical researcher
  3. Medical textbook translator (Zilva and Pannall, 1982/83)
  4. Medical curriculum planner
  5. Medical curriculum quality assurance program
  6. Medical Laboratory Technology lecturer
  7. Medical Laboratory Technology manager
  8. Medical Laboratory Technology preceptorship program
  9. Medical Laboratory Technology training
  10. Medical Education curriculum planner
  11. Medical Education training
  12. Undergraduate supervision
  13. Postgraduate supervision
  14. Business administration

Retired from USM: March 2011


Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab was a retired medical lecturer who made significant contributions in the field of Chemical Pathology. Below are some key points about him.

Academic Achievements at KUIN
  • Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab held the position of Professor of Chemical Pathology at Kolej Universiti Insaniah KUIN) in Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • He had been involved in medical education, including supervising postgraduate students (MSc and PhD), and contributing to the medical curriculum and its review.
  • He played a crucial role in establishing a private medical school (KUIN) in Kedah in November 2011, which received approval from the Malaysian Medical Council and the Malaysian Ministry of Education.
  • The medical program at Kolej Universiti Insaniah (KUIN) began in June 2012 with its first batch of medical students.
  • Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab also oversaw the Chemical Pathology Laboratory reports and ran the Pathology laboratories at KUIN.

Lectureship at AUCMS and MAHSA
  • Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab also contributed to the Allianze University College of Medical Sciences (AUCMS) Medical School in Bertam, Kepala Batas, Penang.
  • He continued to give lectures at the AUCMS Medical School and at MAHSA University.
  • His role involved lecturing, supervising postgraduate students (MSc and PhD), and contributing to the medical curriculum.

Entrepreneurial Ventures
  • After retiring from academia, Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab set up six companies involved in various domains, including food production, aluminium composites, bakery cum restaurant, import-export, automobile workshops, and logistics.
  • His enterprises aim to benefit the Muslim Ummah and create positive impact.
  • After retiring from academia, Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab embarked on an entrepreneurial journey.
  • He has set up six companies since his retirement in March 2011.
  • His ventures spanned various domains, including food production, automobile workshops, import-export, and more.
  • Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab is committed to using his enterprise to benefit the Muslim Ummah.

Details of Business Ventures

Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab had been quite active in the business world, setting up several companies after his retirement from academia. Here are some details about his ventures:
  1. Food Production: Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab is involved in food production. While specific details about the type of food or products are not available, it is likely related to the food industry.
  2. Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Aluminium Composites: His enterprise includes working with aluminium composites. These materials are commonly used in construction, signage, and other applications. Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab's involvement in this field suggests an interest in innovative materials.
  3. Bakery cum Restaurant: Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab had ventured into the food service industry by establishing a bakery cum restaurant. This combination allowed him to offer freshly baked goods alongside a dining experience.
  4. Import-Export: His company engaged in import-export activities. This could involve trading goods internationally, facilitating cross-border transactions, or sourcing products from various countries.
  5. Automobile Workshop: Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab's enterprise included an automobile workshop. This suggests an interest in automotive maintenance, repairs, or related services.
  6. Logistics: Logistics companies handle the movement of goods, transportation, and supply chain management. Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab's involvement in logistics indicates a focus on efficient distribution and delivery.

Community Involvement and Mission to Benefit the Muslim Ummah

His mission was to stay active, useful to others, and engage in deeds that pleased Allah SWT.

Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab's overarching goal is to contribute to the well-being of the Muslim Ummah. His enterprises likely align with this mission, aiming to create positive impact and benefit the community.


Summary

In summary, Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab was a dedicated academician, entrepreneur, and advocate for positive impact within the medical and business realms. Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab's educational journey spanned human resource development and chemical pathology. His commitment to education, entrepreneurship, and community welfare is commendable. Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab's diverse business ventures spanned food production, aluminium composites, dining establishments, import-export, automotive services, and logistics. His commitment to benefiting the Muslim community underscores his entrepreneurial endeavours.


Family

Widow: Hajah Fauziah bt Abdul Karim
Children: 9, many are working professionals
  1. Azzam - Engineer with Shell International. Married Nor Khalilah.
  2. Nadwah - Manager with Petronas. Married Mohd Najib.
  3. Nadirah - IT teacher at secondary school. Married Azrul.
  4. Khairina - Executive with Puncak Niaga. Married Luqman Hakim.
  5. Mohammad - Consultant Civil Engineer, offshore O&G. Married Munirah.
  6. Nabillah - Quantity Surveyor
  7. Munirah - Chemical Engineer
  8. Ismail - Studying Petroleum Engineering
  9. Adlina - Studying

Hajj

Both Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab and wife have performed the Hajj in 2018.

Siblings

Prof. Nor Akmal Wahab was the eldest of four siblings: Nor Akmal, Shadida, Sabri, and Hairani.

--
I will update as information trickles in. - Prof Faridah, 8 Feb. 2024.

Wednesday, 25 October 2023

Anies Baswedan's Impressive Debut

 Anies Baswedan’s Impressive Debut

M. Bakri Musa

October 24, 2023

 

Indonesia’s Presidential hopeful Anies Rasyid Baswedan’s speech on October 11, 2023 at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) was impressive. He epitomizes President Jokowi’s finest legacy of bringing many outstanding young talents into his administration. In the final analysis that is a leader’s greatest and most enduring legacy, not his long tenure or grandiose monuments.

 

            Judging from his speech as well as past performances, Baswedan’s election would assure and indeed accelerate Indonesia’s current already impressive trajectory. That would be good not only for that country but also Malaysia and the region.

 

            Thanks to modern technology I could participate in real time (at least virtually) in that as well as other presentations all over the world. In Malaysia, one series that attracts me is the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization’s World Professorial Lecture (ISTAC/WPL). My praise however, is not unalloyed. Of over two dozen lectures thus far I could recall archiving only a few.

 

            One was the July 3, 2022 talk by Aria Nakissa. A Penn graduate, he obtained his Masters in Islamic Studies at IIUM and then went on to get his JD and PhD at Harvard. He presented his novel research on Islamic Studies utilizing cognitive science, “big data,” and non-traditional sources. The only other distinguished IIUM graduate who had entered my intellectual world was the late Singapore-born Pakistani Shahab Ahmad. A Princeton PhD and a Harvard faculty, he wrote the monumental What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic.

 

            A few observations on Malaysian presentations. First, the long distracting introductions that are not respectful of listeners’ intelligence and precious time. Then there are the irritating technical snafus. Could the organizers not have their staff do a dry run and show the guests how the various gadgets work beforehand?

 

            Fluffs as well as long preambles drown your central message, or worse. To wit, instead of saying, “Ladies and Gentlemen, food is now served,” just seven crisp direct words, a Malaysian host starts by apologizing for the “humble” offerings while profusely thanking the guests for “honoring” the occasion and the chefs for their culinary extravaganza. Then the prolonged effusive salutations and equally-dragged out obligatory supplications. Meanwhile the food gets cold.

 

            Baswedan’s lecture was the rare and refreshing exception. His few slides had a high data/byte ratio and were free from “chartjunk.” Uncluttered and thus informative! He must have read Edward Tufte’s The Visual Display of Quantitative Information.

            

            The program, “The Malay World Civilization’s Future And Its Contribution To Global Discourse On Sustainable Development” lasted over 130 minutes! Baswedan however did not begin to speak till 50 minutes into the program, what with the many long introductory remarks. One speaker gushed with admiration and later broke into tears in his praise for the man. Precious time wasted. People came to hear the speaker, not the host, emcee, introducer, or assorted hangers-on.

 

            Those other speakers added nothing. Not one speaker alluded as to why this man is creating such a buzz with his running for the presidency of Indonesia. Had Baswedan not mentioned that as Governor of Jakarta he successfully tackled that city’s notorious congested streets by improving its public transportation system, I too would not know of his remarkable accomplishment. He mentioned that not to show off, rather as an example of problem solving using our traditional mesyuarah (negotiations) and gotong royong (working together) approaches.

            

            Reflecting the rigor of his American PhD training, Baswedan spent only 27 minutes for his formal presentation, leaving plenty of time for comments. I highlight this because Malays are easily mesmerized by long speeches that deliver nothing but bombastic words. The local social media was abuzz recently over a nonagenarian scholar who spoke for over two hours, and nobody could remember what he said. 

 

            A refreshing feature, because it is so rarely seen these days,) of Baswedan’s presentation was that he could compose his sentences in complete Malay (or Indonesia) without resorting to the irritating jumbling or rojak speech of Malay and English, even in mid-sentence.

 

            The students’ questions were probing and insightful. One asked whether Baswedan’s Malay World was based on geography, culture and language, or genetics. He confessed his ignorance of genetics. Another, from a business major not surprisingly, asked about the possible impact of the proposed Kra Canal.

 

            Baswedan’s simple response was, “Change is inevitable. As such we must be prepared for it.” He did not elaborate on how, but I could after listening to him. Emulate him! Get the best education, learn English (today’s universal language), and continue seeking knowledge. Then leverage our time-honored cultural traditions of mesyuarah and gotong royong to solve problems and get things done.

 

            A senior faculty member hogged the Q&A session to boast of his papers on Biswedan’s illustrious grandfather. Had the moderator not prompted Biswedan, he would not have commented.

 

            Biswedan’s topic interests me as I have just completed the draft of my next book, Malay Civilizational Encounters:  From Pre-Islam Through Colonization And The Digital Age. I congratulate ISTAC/WPL for inviting him. Prime Minister Anwar would do well to have Biswedan address the Malaysian cabinet. If he could solve Jakarta’s horrific traffic mess, shaping up Anwar’s cabinet would be a walk in the park, or on today’s Jakarta streets. While he is at it, Anwar would also do well to ponder grooming his own Anies Biswedan. The greatest legacy for a leader is for him to endow the nation with an ever greater successor.

Monday, 23 October 2023

Cast From the Herd Excerpt #100: Back For The School's Third Term

 Cast From The Herd:  Memories of Matriarchal Malaysia

M. Bakri Musa

Excerpt # 100:  Back for the School’s Third Term


My former Malay College classmates Yusof Sidek, Wan Mahmud, and Ramli Ujang were in the inaugural class of the new medical faculty at the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, which started that May 1963. One weekend Ramli visited me in my village to share his campus experience. He confirmed the stereotype I had of local lecturers. They were aloof; you dared not ask questions lest they would throw the book at you, Ramli related. As for his biochemistry class, his lecturer had not yet returned from his doctoral studies in London. For anatomy, another feared subject in medical school, Ramli said that they were given a cadaver per group of seven students and a dissection manual, and then left on their own. 


            That did not faze me; I had been doing that for biology at Malay College. Back at TMS during my last year there, I studied the entire last half of my class syllabus on my own. Nothing new or scary there! Being the pioneer class, Ramli’s batch received considerable national attention, and I envied him. 


            Meanwhile at my Sekolah Idris the second term was fast coming to a close for the short August holidays. One day my headmaster asked me if I would be back for the third term. Seeing that I would not leave for Canada until mid-September, I replied that I would. He was relieved. 


            We went over the syllabi. He was pleased that I was ahead in both classes. He confided that he was desperate to find my replacement and thus far had no luck. He pleaded with me to stay as long as possible. I was more than happy to oblige. 


            No science teachers, inadequate textbooks, and no biochemistry lecturer, at both high school and university levels. Why couldn’t the authorities plan better? Then they blame the students for not performing well!


            As for my poor students, their next few years, in fact their whole future, remained cloudy. The kindest view would be to regard them as pioneers blazing a new trail. In my heart however, I knew that they were but sacrificial lambs for a dubious cause. During those last few weeks I could barely look them in the eye. Those young innocent faces, so full of hope, were destined for great disappointments. 


            I wondered whether those leaders knew the impact of their policies. They were aware of the lack of teachers, books, and curricula; so why did they push hard the new untried system? Why not start small, test the model, correct the deficiencies, and once established, only then sell the idea? Those leaders must have had supreme confidence in their policies and their ability to execute them. Either that or they considered those young Malay minds expendable, cannon fodder for the nation’s battle for the supremacy of Malay language. 


            If that were so, then those innocent young souls should have been so told. At least then they could savor some sense of sacrifice. They and their parents would then not have their hopes soar so high. In their arrogance, those leaders zealously exhorted others to do their bidding, and those young promising minds bore the burden of their policies’ idiocies. 


            My second term holiday was consumed with preparing for my big trip to Canada. When the third term resumed, my students were surprised to see me back; they thought I would have been long gone. It was tough seeing them during those last few weeks. I felt a heavy burden. I realized that they would be stuck with one substitute teacher after another when I am gone. I consoled myself that they too could be blessed with a wonderful substitute teacher like Mr. Noh earlier who inspired me with Chairil Anwar’s poetry. 


            I tried to rush the syllabus, but the more I did the more resistance I encountered. Even normally diligent students balked, and I faced more disciplinary problems. One day my cousin and fellow teacher Baharuddin approached me. I was unsure what he was driving at, but he finally blurted out that there had been an ugly rumor that my scholarship had been withdrawn and that was why I was back for the third term. I assured him otherwise. Nonetheless he suggested that I should begin talking about my immediate future, of Canada, of becoming a doctor, in short anything to reassure my pupils that their teacher was not a flunky. No student wants a loser to be his teacher; hence their now less-than-respectful attitude towards me.


Next:  Excerpt #101: Threatening Clouds 

Wednesday, 18 October 2023

Cast From The Herd Excerpt #99: Meeting A Polished Canadian Diplomat

 Cast From The Herd:  Memories of Matriarchal Malaysia

M. Bakri Musa

Excerpt # 99:  Meeting A Polished Canadian Diplomat


By February that year (1963), the Higher School Certificate examination results were released. I passed, but Malay College’s aggregate performance was again disastrous. As with the year before, nearly half of my classmates failed to secure a full certificate, the culprit again being the notorious General Paper. Remember the soporific Mr. Tan? No further explanation needed! However in Malaysia, as my parents reminded me earlier and often, the teachers and system were never at fault, only that the students were not diligent enough. 


            Nonetheless the ugly reality remains. The curse of a less-than-diligent teacher goes far and deep. Mr. Tan dashed the hopes of so many of my promising classmates. That burden was borne not only by them but also their families, present and future. I would also add, the community.


            As a physician I am aware that if I were to perform at less-than-my-best, the impact would be felt only by my patients and their families. Not so with a teacher or leader. The curse of a less-than-diligent leader would be borne by the entire nation, and for generations. Likewise, the damage inflicted by a derelict and incompetent teacher goes far beyond his or her classroom. 


            On the flip side, the best that even the most competent physician could do would be to bring her patients back to their pre-illness status, nothing beyond. For an imaginative and inspiring teacher however, there is no limit to the potential achievements of her students once she has ignited their passion for learning. Never underestimate the power, for good and bad, of a teacher. 


            In the meantime I was busy preparing for my departure to Canada. I had received from the university a thick package. After going through them I felt that I knew the place. I visited the Canadian High Commission in Kuala Lumpur for my visa. When I told the receptionist that I would be attending the University of Alberta, she led me in to meet one of the officers who would be leaving the service soon to return to that university. That was how I first met Ivan Head. He was the Third Secretary, the junior-most professional position at the embassy. 


            Seeing that he was so young looking, I asked him what he would be taking, thinking that he would be pursuing graduate work. He smiled and said that he would be joining the Law School faculty. Oops! I was face to face with a soon-to-be Professor of Law! Before I could be embarrassed, he was already taking over the conversation. He updated me on the university, assuring me that its medical school was well regarded. Being an alumnus, he was able to tell me a lot more, as with the campus being in the midst of a massive expansion to accommodate the baby-boom generation. 


            As I sat there now at ease, the thought struck me that this gentleman right across from me would be a Professor, and of Law at that, while I would be but a lowly freshman come that September. He shattered all the stereotypes I had of professors being aloof and imperious. 


            On his desk I saw clippings of Malaysian newspapers. I felt guilty snooping but he showed me his work as Third Secretary. Apart from processing visa applications and answering questions from interested visitors like me, he read what was written in the local media about Canada. 


            I commented that the Canadian Foreign Service must be very competitive to have a law professor as its Third Secretary. Ivan Head laughed. He related that he had enjoyed his assignment in Malaysia and indicated that he did not intend to make the Foreign Service his career. His first love was academia. He had picked Malaysia as his first and only choice; had he not been posted there, he would have stayed in academia. I did not know whether that was the polished diplomat in him speaking or a genuine expression of his love for my country. 


            Encouraged by his lack of formality, I asked him whether I should buy warm clothing in Malaysia or wait till I arrived in Canada. He advised me to wait as whatever I could buy locally would not be warm enough. That sent a chill through me. Besides, there was the matter of style. “That is important for a young man,” he added, with a twinkle in his eye. 


            In that brief visit I knew a little bit about this impressive diplomat, something more of the university, and a lot about Canada. In addition, I learned what a junior diplomat’s work entailed. Quite an education, all in less than half an hour! Ivan Head was the second Canadian I had met; the first being my math teacher earlier, Mr. Brown. I was favorably disposed to both. Good omen! 


            Later that fall in between classes at the University of Alberta, I dropped by the Law Faculty then located in the old Arts Building to look up Professor Head. I found him in his office eating his home-made sandwich. Beside him was a metal lunch pail, the type carried by construction workers. He welcomed me and profusely apologized for being unable to share his sandwich as it had ham. Instead I accepted his apple after he offered it for the third time. There he was thousands of miles away from Malaysia and still remembering the common Malaysian courtesies, as his offering me the apple three times. 


            Professor Head became the faculty advisor to the Malaysian Students Association on campus. He and his wife Ann entertained us often at their home. I also found out a lot more about him. He was a star track athlete and had excelled as an undergraduate as well as in law school, before going to Harvard for his LLM. His particular expertise was the law of the sea, with emphasis on the Canadian Arctic. His seemingly arcane specialty would later be at the center stage of international affairs, with the possibility of a north-west passage. 


            Not long after, he became principal adviser to Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, Canada’s Kissinger as the press dubbed him. I crossed paths with him again at the Banff Springs Hotel. His first comment on seeing me was to inquire about developments in Malaysia. Here was a key advisor to the Canadian Prime Minister with a special interest in Malaysia. I wondered whether the Malaysian ambassador in Ottawa was taking full advantage of that fact. 


            My last official business before leaving Malaysia was a briefing from a certain Mrs. McCoy, the “Principal Establishment Officer.” From her name I thought she was a leftover colonial officer who had missed out on her golden handshake, or one who had gone native. Imagine my shock to find a smallish Indian lady clad in a bright flowing saree with her black shiny hair pulled back severely in a tight bun. 


            “So you figure yourself pretty smart to get this scholarship?” She chided me. “If you are not careful you could end up like the rest of them; having too much fun and flunking out.” She was a more threatening school mistress, less a helpful public servant. 


            Who was she to lecture me? She did not even know me. The nerve of her! Only the knowledge that she was in charge of my scholarship made me listen meekly and endure her bullying. That only encouraged her; she went on and on. 


            At last I was let out, but not before she blasted out a final barrage. “Come back with only the certificate issued by your university,” she snarled. “Don’t bring home marriage and birth certificates!” 


            That was it. No goodbyes or good wishes. If she had meant her last statement to be a joke, I missed it. I could not help comparing this experience to my earlier one with Ivan Head. And the Canadian government, not Malaysian, would be funding my studies. 


            People judge others as they would themselves. Mrs. McCoy thought others were like her, irresponsible and not diligent; hence her treating me that way. Ivan Head on the other hand was smart and conscientious; he believed others too were like him, and he treated them likewise.


Next:  Excerpt # 100:  Back for the Third School Term

Monday, 16 October 2023

Leverage Islamic Studies To Make Malays Trilingual

 Leverage Islamic Studies To Make Malays Trilingual

M. Bakri Musa

October 17, 2023

 

In January 2023 Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim declared that Islamic studies in schools and universities be reviewed to emphasize universal human values. A decade earlier at a Symposium on Higher Education in Muslim Societies at the Wilson Institute, Washington, DC, he asserted, “The crisis in higher education in many Muslim countries is manifested in myriad ways. . . . Among the root causes are those related to choice, content, and quality . . . . Islamic education has not much progressed . . . [beyond] Qur’anic and hadith studies.” 

 

            Dispensing with rhetoric, I suggest using Islamic Studies to make Malays trilingual:  Malay, English, and Arabic. As per modern neuroscience, multilingualism confers many cognitive advantages, quite apart from expanding your mind and worldview, together with conferring other advantages beyond mere economics. Non-Malay Malaysians are successful because most are functionally trilingual:  Malay, English, and their native tongue. The Apek in Ulu Kinta who could speak only Hakka or the rubber tapper in Ulu Tiram only Tamil is unlikely to improve himself, much less contribute to the nation. Likewise the Malay fisherman in Ulu Marang who could communicate only in his Terengganu dialect.

 

            In his 2024 Budget, Anwar allocated a whopping 20 percent to education, including and especially the resumption of government grants to religious schools, together with building new ones. The budget for the latter exceeds that for STEM improvements for the entire nation! Even the proposed Artificial Intelligence Faculty at Universiti Teknoloji Malaysia gets far less. Stop funding religious education, much less build new schools, until its roles and objectives are rationalized.

 

            Islamic bureaucracy also gets a whopping allocation. The strength of Islam is with and in the people, not with massive bureaucracies and sprawling magnificent edifices.

 

            There is a more fundamental issue with Islamic education. Muslim educators and teachers view it as less to sharpen minds, more to fill them with dogmas. Less education, more indoctrination. Syed Naquib Alattas put it more elegantly but the essence remains:  to produce individuals with adab, the consequence of their having acquired knowledge (ilmu), and with that hikmah (wisdom). In Malay, adab means etiquette or good behavior. Know things and their proper place and role, as per the good Syed. For mere mortals, know your place!

 

            Alas that’s the big rub. Who decides what is proper? Throughout history progress depended on those rare brave individuals who had challenged the natural order. In Islam, as per our Syed, that would be biadab. Challenge corrupt leaders as Hang Jebat did, then you would be far worse than biadab but derhaka(treasonous). Obey your sultan and you would be a hero, heaped with royal titles, and be venerated forever! You could even mess around with his concubines, as Hang Tuah did. On the other hand, had my late grandfather “knew his place,” I would today be a hamba (slave) at the palace in Sri Menanti.

 

            Many dismissed modern education for being secular, devoid of values, good only for producing mere pegs for the cogs of the capitalist machinery. Pegs or not, the diligent worker who wakes up every morning to pick up your garage or attend to the electrical grid is serving his community. Spend all day at ratib (prayers) may get you to heaven, as per your reading of ancient texts, but you are not contributing to society. You are but a societal parasite. At least biological ones provide a useful service; they help tune up your immune response, that is, until they overwhelm you!

 

            Munshi Abdullah likened a child’s mind to a parang, to be sharpened, not a dustbin to be filled with dogmas. Education is that sharpener. With a sharp parang you could hack yourself out of a jungle, or carve exquisite pieces of sculpture. All you could retrieve from a dustbin is what you had thrown in, minus what’s stuck at the bottom.

 

            Anwar Ibrahim should ask some tough questions of his education ministers. Are our schools and universities for rigorous intellectual pursuits or vocational training to produce future ulama? Even if we were to opt only for the latter, at least produce thinking ones, not those who could only recite pat answers gleaned from moldy tomes when faced with today’s complex dilemmas.

 

Friday, 13 October 2023

Mereka Yang Sebenarnya Bersalah Dalam Kes Ahamd Zahid

  Mereka Yang Sebenarnya Bersalah Dalam Kes Jenayah Ahmad Zahid

M. Bakri Musa

 

October 10, 2023

 

Keputusan Mahkamah bulan lalu (September 4, 2023) melepaskan tanpa membebaskan (DNAA – nama singkatan dalam Bahasa Inggeris – Dismissal not amounting to an acquittal) Timbalan Perdana Menteri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi daripada tuduhan rasuah jenayah dan pengubahan wang haram berkaitan dengan dana Yayasan Akalbudi RM 31 juta mencetuskan banyak bidasan dari pakar undang-undang serta orang ramai. Ia juga nyaris menyebabkan satu pertunjukkan perasaan yang besar di ibukota. 

 

            Kemarahan dan perasaan kurang puas hati diarahkan pertama kepada Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim; kedua atas kelemahan dan kurang kecekapan pentadbiran kehakiman dan undang undang negara. Zahid ialah Timbalan kepada Perdana Menteri Anwar. Oleh sebab itu, tohmahan pertama boleh agak difahami walau pun tidak berasas dan mungkin tersasar. Bandingkan dengan tiadanya bantahan ramai apabila bekas Perdana Menteri Muhyiddin Yassin dibebaskan daripada tuduhan rasuah melibatkan jumlah yang lebih besar, yakni RM 232.5 juta.

 

            Dari segi kelemahan pentadbiran kehakiman, itu pun tidak bertempat. Malaysia adalah salah satu daripada beberapa negara yang telah berjaya mendakwa dan mempenjarakan bekas Perdana Menterinya. Itu menunjukkan pentadbiran kehakiman yang beres. Tetapi dengan Zahid pula, hasilnya jauh berbeza. Mengapa?

 

            Perlu di perhatikan dan mesti diingatkan bahawa bersabit dengan kes bekas Perdana Menteri Najib Razak, Peguam Negara (AG) berkenaan, Tommy Thomas, dan ketua pendakwa raya, mendiang Gopal Sri Ram, bukanlah pegawai tetap Perkhidmatan Awam. Berdua di ambil khas dari dunia swasta. Ini menunjukkan bahawa kita akan lebih bermanfaat jika memereksa bukan cara perhakiman negara tetapi sebaliknya kepada dramatis personae, atau mereka yang berkait dengan pendakwaan Zahid.

 

            Pertama ialah Peguam Negara kes Zahid, Idrus Harun. Dia memohon kepada mahkamah untuk melepaskan tanpa membebaskan (DNAA) Zahid hanya beberapa hari sahaja sebelum beliau bersara. Kedua, teliti sedikit kelulusan dan pengalaman dia. Ijazah undang-undangnya dari universiti tempatan dan dia tidak pernah pun berkerja di luar perkhidmatan awam. Pendek kata, dia mencerminkan mereka yang memperolehi kelulusan serta kerjanya atas atau melalui hak istimewa Melayu.

 

            Yang lebih penting dan amat pelik, Idrus meminta DNAA itu semasa pertengahan perbicaraan yang sudah berlalu terpanjang, memakan lebih 53 hari mahkamah, mendengar daripada 99 saksi, dan selepas hakim memutuskan bahawa terdapat bukti prima facie (sepintas lalu) dan memerintahkan Zahid membela dirinya atas semua tuduhan.

 

            Alasan Idrus Harun ialah (kononnya dalam katanya kepada Perdana Menteri Anwar) "untuk membersihkan hati nuraninya [Idrus] sebelum bersara." Patutnya hati nurani Idrus sudah tentunya jelas apabila dia memulakan pendakwaan Zahid.

 

            Bagi pehak ketua pendakwa raya Zahid yang awal, Raja Rosela Toran, gaya persembahannya serta tatatertip beliau di dalam mahkamah menunjukkan bahawa dia tidak sedikit pun gentar atau hairan dengan kedudukan tinggi Zahid. Raja Rosela juga, tidak seperti Idrus Harun, telah memilih untuk bersara lebih awal lagi untuk memasuki sektor swasta. Perbuatan sedemikian bukanlah satu kebiasaan kepada mereka yang berjaya tanpa bergantung atas hak istimewa Melayu. Ini disahkan seterusnya. Raja Rosela, tidak seperti Idrus Harun, bukan seorang graduan tempatan.

 

            Bagi hakim Yang Arif Collin Lawrence Sequerah pula, dia tersekat atas pendapatannya serta apa yang dia boleh buat. Tangan dan mulutnya terikat oleh undang undang negara serta tertatartib mahkahmah. Boleh tak boleh dia mesti membenarkan kehendak pendakwa yang memohon DNAA untuk Zahid. Dia hanya dapat membidas pendakwa serta kerajaan dengan cara halus. Yakni, pembicaran yang sudah pun berpanjangan merupakan satu lakuan yang membazirkan dana rakyat dan masa kakitangan kerajaan. Di sebalik kesopanan perutusan undang-undang itu, Yang Arif sebenarnya mengecam Idrus Harun.

 

            Saya tidak tahu di mana Hakim Sequerah memperolehi kelayakan undang-undangnya, tetapi dia perpegalaman luas diluar perkhidmatan awam. Serta dengan namanya, dia tidak mungkin seorang yang tergantung kepada hak istimewa Melayu untuk mendapat kelulusan atau jawatannya.

 

            Pengganti Idris Harun sebagai Peguam Negara ialah Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh, seorang lagi graduan undangan tempatan. Dia juga telah menghabiskan keseluruhan kerjayanya dalam perkhidmatan awam. Tidak mustahil jika ia akan mengikut langkah si Idrus Harun.

 

            Semasa Anwar menjadi Perdana Menteri saya mencadangkan supaya beliau menggantikan Peguam Negara Idris Harun dan Ketua Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia. Jika difikirkan semula, adalah kebijaksanaan Anwar yang dia tidak membuat sedemikian. Bayangkanlah jika Peguam Negara baru yang dilantik oleh Anwar memohon DNAA untuk Zahid! Malangnya pemerhatian isyarat ini terlepas oleh mereka yang mengecam Anwar dan mendakwa dia bercampur tangan politik dalam kes DNAA Zahid.

 

            Sebaliknya jika Anwar pada mulanya melantik seorang luar yang berkaliber seperti Tommy Thomas sebagai Peguam Negara, bekas Perdana Menteri Muhyiddin Yassin mungkin hari ini sudah dalam penjara menyertai si Najib Razak. Begitu juga Ahmad Zahid. Renungkan sedikit berapa rengannya masaalah serta pening kepala Anwar sekarang! Maklumlah, Zahid akan di ganti oleh Mat Hassan sebagai ketua UMNO serta terus menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri yang baharu. UMNO tidak mungkin meninggalkan gabungan Anwar kerana pemimpin mereka kini sudah syok menikmati faedah mereka sebagai menteri.

 

            Anwar sedar dari awal semasa dia melantik Zahid sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri bahawa dia (Zahid) sudah pun menghadapi tuduhan jenayah tersebut. "Tidak bersalah sehingga dibuktikan bersalah" adalah amalan undang-undang dimahkamah jenayah. Tetapi di dunia luar, seperti memilih seseorang untuk jawatan tinggi seperti menteri kerajaan, itu semestinya memerlukan taraf amanah yang lebih tinggi, seperti tidak ada sedikit pun bau yang tidak sedap atau kelakuan yang tidak wajar.

 

            Walau pun demikian rakyat Malaysia dalam kebijaksanaan mereka tidak memberi Anwar mandat majoriti dan dengan itu dia tidak bebas untuk memilih sesiapa yang diingginnya untuk menjadi menteri. Dia terpaksa memilih ranting yang diberi padanya oleh rakyat. Mewujudkan gabungan politik banyak ceritanya. Itu bukanlah satu perbuatan untuk mereka yang murni atau lemah semangat.

 

            Inilah kelebihan besar Anwar. Akibatnya sudah nyata. Negara pada hari ini mempunyai kerajaan yang stabil. Yang lebih penting lagi, negara dapat menjauhi kepimpinan kolot bolot Mahathir. Dia sedia dan tidak habis memburokkan kerajaan Anwar Ibrahim. Renungkan lebih sedikit sekali lagi. Oleh sebab kebijaksanaan politik Anwar negara sekarang tidak di bawah pemerintahan PAS dan Perikatan Nasional. Kedua dua nya korup serta tidak cekap. Bagi mereka yang sekarang mengutuk Anwar, ingatkanlah sedikit bahala yang negara kita sudah dapat elakkan. Fikiran sedemikian patut menginsafkan kita.

 

            Saya harap Jawatankuasa Pilihan Parlimen akan meneliti kes DNAA Ahmad Zahid dengan teliti, terutamanya peranan kaki tangan kerajaan dari pihak pendakwa bermula dengan bekas Peguam Negara Idrus Harun. Saya harap keputusan Jawatan Kuasa Pilihan Parlimen tersebut akan mendorong Anwar untuk menggantikan Peguam Negara serta Ketua SPRM semasa dengan profesional dari luar yang berkelayakan dan pengalaman mantang. Ini adalah keputusan yang sudah terbukti. Penyerapan mereka dari luar yang berbakat serta beres amat diperlukan oleh negara pada masa ini.

 

Wednesday, 11 October 2023

The Missing Culprit(s) In Ahmad Zahid's Court Case

 The Missing Culprit(s) In Ahmad Zahid’s Court Case

M. Bakri Musa

 

October 10, 2023

 

Last month’s (September 4, 2023) dismissal not amounting to an acquittal (the now infamous acronym DNAA) of criminal corruption and money laundering charges related to the RM 31M Yayasan Akalbudi funds against Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi triggered a torrent of responses from local pundits, lay as well as legal. It also prompted a failed mass demonstration.

 

            The fury was directed primarily at Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and only secondarily on the presumed flaws in the system. Zahid being Anwar’s Deputy makes the first understandable, though still misplaced. For contrast as well as perspective, note the lack of outrage when Former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin was acquitted of corruption charges involving the mega sum of RM 232.5 million.

 

            As for the presumed flaws of the system, Malaysia remains one of the few countries that have successfully prosecuted and jailed her former Chief Executive. Same system but vastly different results. What gives?

 

            In the conviction of former Prime Minister Najib Razak, it is well to remember that both the Attorney General (AG) Tommy Thomas and lead prosecutor, the late Gopal Sri Ram, were not career civil servants. That suggests it would be more fruitful to look not at the system rather the dramatis personae in the Zahid’s case. 

 

            With Zahid, AG Idrus Harun, now safely retired, was a local law graduate who had never spent a day of his career outside the insular civil service, typical of an affirmative action product. More significant, he requested the DNAA just days before retiring and amidst a long trial that had already consumed over 53 court days, heard from 99 witnesses, and where the judge had earlier ruled that there was prima facie (at first glance) evidence and thus ordered Zahid to enter his defense on all counts.

 

            AG Idrus Harun’s purported reason to seek a DNAA at this late stage was, as reported by Prime Minister Anwar, “to clear his [Idrus] conscience before retiring.” I thought Idrus’s conscience was (or should have been) clear when he first filed those charges.

 

            As for the initial lead prosecutor, Raja Rosela Toran, her courtroom performances indicated that she was not in the least intimidated by Zahid’s exalted position. Unlike Idrus Harun, Raja Rosela had opted for early retirement to enter the private sector, not typical for a product of affirmative action, further confirmed by the fact that she, again unlike Idrus Harun, was not a local law graduate.

 

            As for the trial judge, The Honorable Collin Lawrence Sequerah, constrained in both his options and opinions, could only comment that asking for a DNAA at this late stage was but a massive waste of taxpayers’ money. Behind that legal decorum, he was in fact excoriating AG Idrus Harun.

 

            I do not know where Judge Sequerah obtained his law qualification, but he had spent a chunk of his career in a major law firm before becoming a judge. That, together with his name, suggests he is unlikely to be a product of affirmative action.

 

            Idris Harun’s successor as AG is one Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh, another local law graduate who had also spent his entire career in the civil service. He is also most likely an affirmative action product. As such, expect another Idrus Harun performance.

 

            When Anwar became Prime Minister I suggested that he replace both AG Idris Harun and Chief of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. In retrospect it was wise that Anwar did not. Imagine the uproar had an Anwar-appointed AG were to seek Zahid’s DNAA! Alas this signal observation is missed by those who claimed political interference in Zahid’s DNAA.

 

            On the other hand had Anwar appointed another AG in the caliber of Tommy Thomas, former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin would today be in jail joining Najib. Likewise, Ahmad Zahid. Anwar would then be relieved of a major political headache, with Zahid’s deputy in UMNO, Mat Hassan, now becoming the new Deputy Prime Minister. UMNO is unlikely to leave Anwar’s coalition as UMNO leaders are now enjoying their perks.

 

            When Anwar appointed Zahid, Anwar was aware that he (Zahid) already faced those charges. While “innocent till proven guilty” is a fine legal precept in a criminal courtroom, not so when choosing someone for positions requiring high trust. The standard there must of necessity be more stringent, as with not even a hint of impropriety. However, Malaysians in their wisdom did not give Anwar a majority mandate and thus that privilege or freedom of choice is denied him. He had to reach out to Zahid, no doubt fingers to nose. Crafting a political coalition is not for the purists or faint-hearted.

 

            It is Anwar’s political genius that Malaysia today has a stable government. More significantly, Anwar has spared Malaysia the malignant leadership of the discredited Mahathir and his band of incompetents in PAS and Perikatan Nasional. For those now critical of Anwar, nothing focuses the mind more than to think of that alternative. 

 

            I hope Parliament’s Select Committee will grill all the major players in the Zahid case, except of course the Judge. Anwar should also seize that opportunity to replace the current AG as well as MACC Chief with competent professionals from the outside. An infusion of fresh top talent is what the nation desperately needs today.